Categories
Policy

Québec Independence

I am not a Western Separatist. However, I do believe Canada would benefit by divorcing Québec (s. 91(26) British North America Act, 1867). I am also willing to bet most Québecois would prefer to be independent of Ottawa …

It must be admitted that attempting to occupy two competing positions (languages) at the same time is awkward and difficult. It creates a cultural impasse and stymies social progress because nationality is defined linguistically.

Official bilingualism is another ill-conceived policy of the Trudeau administration (Pierre administered the Official Languages Act in 1969 making Canada officially bilingual). Since then, our country has been 50% as efficient.

It would be wrong to continue trying to fit Francophone Québec within an Anglophone Canada because it creates a conflict of interest at the national level that permeates everything from education to law courts. Requiring every government document and sign to be printed/pronounced in both languages is a competitive disadvantage and a waste of taxpayer resources.

Canada would be better off unilingual (English only). In the long-run, Canada will be either French or English – but not both. This has been a development in the making for a considerable time now. Therefore, we ought to accelerate this process by endorsing only one of these languages while granting the other independence.

This grant of sovereignty would be conditional on maintaining a geographic trade corridor between the Maritime provinces and the rest of Canada.

This is not an easy topic to address because it would fundamentally change the structure of our confederation. Canada would never be the same. However, it would be in the best interests of our nation to do so. It would also release a considerable amount of political tension caused by our constitution’s attempt to fuse divergent nationalities into a single country.

Under this arrangement, Québec would be its own sovereign country within the British Commonwealth in accordance with Article 4 of the Treaty of Paris (February 10th, 1763).

Subject to the will of God, Québec is now independent of Canada:

“What God has joined together, let no man separate.”

– the Gospel according to Mark 10:9

Solemnly declared,

Travis Mitchell Patron
Independent Candidate for Parliament (45th Federal Election)
www.travispatron.ca

Canadian Nationalist Party
Since 1933
www.nationalist.ca

Categories
Policy

Leadership Contest

leadership contest means a competition for the selection of the leader of a registered party.

Section 2, Canada Elections Act

It has been said that nothing exists in a vacuum and my leadership with the Canadian Nationalist Party is no exception.

In order to remain viable, it must be contestable. It is not my intention to be a self-appointed dictator of the party.

For this reason, I am hereby announcing that the Canadian Nationalist Party will commence a leadership contest at the conclusion of this 45th Federal Election (April 28th) in order to determine the question of party leadership. The contest will conclude when the Governor General of Canada issues the writ commencing the 46th Federal Election or the contest is concluded according to its rules of procedure (whichever comes first).

What this means is that any naturalized citizen may stand for nomination to become the new leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party.

I am making this decision because in order to remain fair, the position of party leader must be potentially available to any naturalized Canadian.

Although Elections Canada claims that our party is no longer registered, I maintain that our party was de-registered in violation of Canadian law. Therefore, the leadership contest will be conducted internally in accordance with the Canada Elections Act.

Canadian Nationalist Party event (showing guest speaker) held at Royal Canadian Legion Branch 344 in May of 2018.

Notice of Leadership Contest
If a registered party proposes to hold a leadership contest, the party’s chief agent shall file with the Chief Electoral Officer a statement setting out the dates on which the leadership contest is to begin and end.

– Section 478.1(1), Canada Elections Act

The terms of the contest are such that a new leader ought not to be determined by way of popular vote (every individual casting a ballot of equal weight). This is so because I don’t believe ballot casting to be the “nationalistic way”. The opinion of some simply carries more weight than others. Certain people should be able to influence their government to a greater degree than others. Indeed, when democracy consists of every divergent motive casting an equal say in the function of their government, it becomes stagnant, and the people whom democracy is meant to serve, are neglected.

The strongest and most intelligent have a divine right to rule. Therefore, our leadership contest will not be a display of ballot casting, but one of Canadian trivia.

Yes, the leader of the party must demonstrate they have the best working knowledge as it relates to Canadian society, history, and government.

This contest of trivia will be administered by an impartial panel of questioners and judges.

For each question answered correctly, a contestant will earn 1 point, and these points will continue accumulating for the duration of the contest. Each trivia session will feature 10 questions posed to the contestants. Trivia sessions will be held on a periodic (monthly) basis until the conclusion of the contest (whenever the 46th Federal Election is called). If no writ is issued by the Governor General, the contest will continue until one contestant accumulates 30 points more than any other contestant.

If a new leader were chosen using this method, many aspects of the party would be subject to change. However, in outlining the parameters of this leadership contest, there are 3 things that I ask not to be changed by any party leader:

  1. The party name ‘Canadian Nationalist Party’.
  2. The party website domain name ‘www.nationalist.ca‘.
  3. The party logo/symbol:
Medicinal Sun Wheel, Official Symbol of the Canadian Nationalist Party

I also reserve my right to compete in any such leadership contest myself. For now, I remain the incumbent leader.

Membership eligibility will continue to be open to naturalized Canadians only.

If you are someone who is interested in contesting leadership, you may apply by email (info@travispatron.ca) with subject line ‘Leadership Contest’.

A person may participate in this leadership contest at any point prior to its conclusion. However, in order to apply, the contestant must provide personal identification.

In order to facilitate this contest, the Canadian Nationalist Party reserves the right to peaceful public assembly in accordance with section 2(c) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


Note: the contest original stated it would be concluded when one contestant accumulated 50 points more than any other contestant. This target has been reduced to 30 points more than any other contestant.

Categories
Judicial

Elections Fraud In Canada

Under the guise of “ending hate”, the Government of Canada is facilitating a radical demographic change of our founding population.

This hypocrisy of biblical proportions (Matthew 23) aims at reducing Canadians to a dwindled minority in their homeland in order to transition us into “the world’s first post-national country” as communicated by the Liberal government shortly after their election to the Prime Minister’s office in 2015.

In order to do so, this administration is depriving our nation of any meaningful democratic channel.

At seemingly every opportunity, those who advocate the ideology of nationalism are excluded from public property without due process. This includes libraries we’ve not been to, convention centers we’ve already booked, and university campuses we’re alumni of.

The reason that these Globalists are attempting to suppress our voices and injure our public image is because they know the only ideology capable of resisting their hostile takeover of our sovereignty is that of nationalism – a group of people united by ancestry and origin, speaking the same language and working for a common objective.

If they are to achieve their political agenda of a one-world government oligarchy, they cannot have sovereign nations operating autonomously outside their locus of control.

The perpetrators claim that our propaganda entitled “Beware The Parasitic Tribe” is a criminal liability under section 319 of the Criminal Code. They’ve been making such accusations since June of 2019. We’ve yet to receive a copy of the evidence used against us despite numerous requests for full and frank disclosure.

This propaganda uploaded to our website in June of 2019 is not a criminal liability because the Province Of Saskatchewan lacks inpersonam jurisdiction to prosecute such matters under section 319 of the Criminal Code:

The Province Of Saskatchewan committed an error in law on April 16th, 2021 by applying a reverse onus on the accused to show cause why they should be granted release during a bail review. During this bail review, the court used accusations of so-called “hate speech” in relation to the party leader publishing propaganda entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe as secondary grounds to deny reasonable bail. In their June 29th, 2021 decision, Justice Robertson of the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan, refused my application to (by way of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum) perform “at least” a review of jurisdictional error made by Justice Hinds in applying this reverse onus. On December 2nd, 2021, the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (CACR3476) again refused to perform such a review of jurisdictional error made in denying me bail earlier that year. Justice Robertson would then go on to preside over proceedings in the Court of King’s Bench, where I was sentenced ultra vires to 365 days incarceration for the aforementioned propaganda.

What the Province Of Saskatchewan has actually done is aid in illegally depriving our nation of a democratic channel.

In 2021, shortly after I was denied bail by the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan, Elections Canada (supposedly partisan and independent) changed the information contained in their registry as it relates to the Canadian Nationalist Party, replacing myself as the leader with Gus Stefanis (someone who was neither a candidate nor a party member at the time):

Elections Canada changed the leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party ex parte and in violation of procedures laid out in the Canada Elections Act for updating a registered party’s information.

In accordance with section 405(3) of the Canada Elections Act, such a change in the information of a registered party must be made by resolution of the party. However, at no point did our party resolve to appoint a new leader …

New Leader
The report of a change of leader for a party shall include a copy of the resolution of the party to appoint the new leader, certified by the new leader and another officer of the party.

– Section 405(3), Canada Elections Act

The Canadian Nationalist Party is structured as a corporate sole, meaning that with only a single director (myself), the decisions which affect the corporation internally cannot be made except by the will of that sole director.

With the actual leader (myself) being arbitrarily imprisoned by the Province Of Saskatchewan, and new leader (Gus Stefanis) unable to maintain 250 declared members, Elections Canada de-registered the party on March 31st, 2022.

Elections Canada de-registered the federal Nationalist Party as its leader was being imprisoned in contravention of their right to have the validity of their detention determined by habeas corpus.

The right to have the validity of a person’s imprisonment determined by writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental principle of justice inherent in the constitution of all countries within the British Commonwealth.

It is also encoded in section 2 of our Canadian Bill of Rights:

The Parliament of Canada, affirming that our nation is founded upon the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person, and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions which remain free only with respect to morality, spirituality, and the rule of law.

Every law of Canada shall, unless it is expressly declared by an Act of the Parliament of Canada that is shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgement or infringement of any of the rights and freedoms herein recognized and declared, and in particular, no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to deprive a person who has been detained with remedy by way of habeas corpus for the determination of the validity of his imprisonment and for his release if the detention is not lawful;

– Section 2(c)(iii), Canadian Bill of Rights

This is indeed a matter of national security which demands a court proceeding be conducted pursuant section 784(3) of the Criminal Code:

Refusal of application, and appeal
Where an application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is refused by a judge of a court having jurisdiction therein, no application may again be made on the same grounds, whether to the same or to another court or judge, unless fresh evidence is adduced, but an appeal from that refusal shall lie to the court of appeal, and where on the appeal the application is refused a further appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court of Canada, with leave of that Court.

– Section 784(3), Criminal Code

Shortly after the change in Elections Canada’s registry of party information was made, Stefanis was allowed to stand for nomination as a candidate in the 44th Federal Election with Elections Canada.

The name ‘Canadian Nationalist Party’ is proprietary information not to be used without the necessary permissions.

Trafficking in Identity Information
Everyone commits an offence who obtains or possesses another person’s identity information with intent to use it to commit an indictable offence that includes fraud, deceit, or falsehood as an element of the offence.

– Section 402.2(2), Criminal Code

I bring this matter to the public’s attention not for my sake as an individual, but for the sake of our collective, our nationality. Something is clearly wrong when our nation can be so nonchalantly the victim of elections fraud.

Fraud Affecting Public Market
Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

– Section 380(2), Criminal Code

Part of the reason I ran in this here 45th Federal Election was to bring public accountability to this claim of elections fraud. However, it seems Elections Canada is intent on covering up their violation of our party using more lies.

Below you will see the list of candidates standing for election in the district of Souris-Moose Mountain. You will also notice my campaign website (www.travispatron.ca) conspicuously missing from their listing despite being included in my nomination papers.

Listing of Candidates in district of Souris-Moose Mountain for 45th Federal Election

In response to Elections Canada not listing my campaign website, I filed a complaint with their office on Friday, April 11th. A week later my website is still not listed but I did receive this response from Elections Canada, refusing to list this website because, in their opinion, it is “hateful”:

This sort of baseless accusation is becoming increasingly common in Canadian society and used to unreasonably deprive our people of all sorts of public services.

At this point, my message to Canadians would be that if we are waiting for political change to come through the ballot box, we will be waiting until the cows come home.

One of the strengths of nationalism lies in its versatility. What I mean by this is that if the status quo is providing us no meaningful democratic channel, than our activism must take on an anti-democratic form.

We need not wait for the next opportunity to compete in one of Elections Canada’s contests because liberation is simply not on the ballot.