Categories
Policy

No More War

“Judgement is rendered against every nation and all people in the world who carry on war, or who are accessory to war, whereby any man, created alive by Jehovah, is slain, in defense of any king or other ruler, or in defense of any country or government in all the world.”

  • OAHSPE, Book Of Judgement, Chapter 32 verse 13

War is a terrible thing, especially when it is waged against Anglo-Saxony.

On this Remembrance Day 2025, let us admit that waging war against our Anglo-Saxon brothers in the Great War of 1939-1945 was ultimately fruitless. Senseless destruction was brought upon our people and we are still dealing with the traumatic fallout today.

Britannica has emerged from this conflict as a “false victor”. It has not emerged stronger, only indebted.

We cannot pretend that the bombing of Dresden, Germany was necessary to bring about an end to the war, let alone our involvement in it. What occurred under British Royal Air Force (RAF) Commander Sir Arthur Harris was the bombing of civilian targets and the commission of a war crime. In executing such a campaign, Britannica became the aggressor.

One of the political figures of the time who had the courage to speak out against this aggression was George Bell (1883-1958), Bishop of Chichester, whose words of warning still resonate despite the backlash he received from his contemporaries:

“Why is there this blindness to the psychological side? Why is there this inability to reckon with the moral and spiritual facts? Why is there this forgetfulness of the ideals by which our cause is inspired? How can the War Cabinet fail to see that this progressive devastation of cities is threatening the roots of civilization? How can they be blind to the harvest of even fiercer warring and desolation, even in this country, to which the present destruction will inevitably lead when the members of the War Cabinet have long passed to their rest? How can they fail to realize that this is not the way to curb military aggression and end war? This is an extraordinarily solemn moment. What we do in war—which, after all, lasts a comparatively short time—affects the whole character of peace, which covers a much longer period. The sufferings of Europe, brought about by the demoniac cruelty of Hitler and his Nazis, and hardly imaginable to those in this country who for the last five years have not been out of this island or had intimate association with Hitler’s victims, are not to be healed by the use of power only, power exclusive and unlimited. The Allies stand for something greater than power. The chief name inscribed on our banner is “Law.” It is of supreme importance that we who, with our Allies, are the liberators of Europe should so use power that it is always under the control of law. It is because the bombing of enemy towns—this area bombing—raises this issue of power unlimited and exclusive that such immense importance is bound to attach to the policy and action of His Majesty’s Government.”

If our collective wounds are to be healed, we must be willing to admit that Britannica was manipulated into this war, not for their own benefit, but for the profit of an international financial clique:

“We shall instigate economic and military wars between the Goyim states. When wars are over both sides are devastated and at the mercy of our international finance. This is our “Harvest.” First, we manufacture the huge war machines. Second we destroy the flower of nationhood thereby weakening the racial stamina of the Goyim. Third, when the nations are prostrate under huge debts, we profit interest upon interest.”

  • Protocols of the Elders of Zion

Canada essentially followed the United Kingdom when they declared war on Germany in 1939. We should never have waged such a war against Germany.

However, we now have special interest groups lobbying our parliament under the guise of “combatting hate” in order to suppress our voice as it relates to this historical event and (eventually) outlaw ethnic nationalism.

If our efforts during WW2 truly were victorious, then we would not be the victims of such censorship. We didn’t fight to have our freedom of expression restricted …

Without the ability to discern our history, Canada cannot survive. This legislation being enacted by Parliament is manifestly unlawful because it threatens our ability to do so.

We are called to be a light unto all nations, and so we must keep the welfare of others in mind – including those outside our Commonwealth.

We at the Canadian Nationalist Party do not associate with those who view Britannica’s war against Germany as justified. We renounce our ties to any national government who endorses the destruction of civilian targets through military force. We conscientiously object to aiding or abetting war in any way against our blood brothers.

The destruction caused by the Great War of 1939-1945 is no exception. This conflict has wrought such trauma upon our people that we are still feeling the repercussions today.

Although this may be a painful topic for many, willfully ignoring this issue will only make it worse. The karmic debt will continue to weigh heavily on those who refuse to recant. This war effort should not be regarded as a “victory” because it was a moral loss. This war has been profitable to no one but the international banking cartel.

We should not use Remembrance Day to commemorate this war effort and certainly not delude ourselves into thinking we inherited a “free and democratic society” because of it. This is the sine qua non of this statutory holiday. I’m not grateful to those who invaded Germany. At no point was the integrity of Canadian territory threatened.

When humans are manipulated into killing their own kind, the only victor is the enemy.

Let the people who are willing to wash their hands clean of this senseless conflict, those who recognize that the masses have been manipulated into war, let them find a place of refuge amongst our ranks.

“Your armies shall be disbanded. And, from this time forward, whoever desires to not war, thou shall not impress; for it is the commandment of your Creator.”

  • OAHSPE, Prologue, Ch. 1 verse 17
Categories
Poetry

Electra

potentiated electro-motive force

The wheel of karma.
Upon it, everything turns.
The law of motion dictates,
an action outside it will not move.
The only way to overcome,
is to balance the wheel.

Categories
Judicial

Open Letter To Steven Bonk (MP) On Proposed Bail Reforms

This is an open letter sent to Steven Bonk, Member Of Parliament for the district of Souris – Moose Mountain, in the evening of October 29th, 2025:

Mr. Bonk,

I am writing you regarding the second reading of Bill C-14 which is scheduled to take place tomorrow. I am concerned that the proposed changes to onus provisions contained in the Criminal Code risk infringing Canadian constitutionality, specifically, our section 11(d) Charter right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a fair and public hearing.

As you may already know, given all else equal, the burden of proof to show cause why an accused person ought to be denied bail lies with the prosecution. However, these proposed changes tabled in Bill C-14 seek to change this so that a reverse onus is on an accused person where they are “charged with an offense in the commission of which random and unprovoked violence was used or attempted”.

In the absence of a fair trial (as described by the aforementioned Charter right), it is plainly prejudicial for a Justice to determine during a bail review that the commission of the offense is “random and unprovoked”. Provocation is not something customarily determined at the stage of a bail review nor should it be.

A reverse onus should not be placed on the accused to show cause unless, on a balance of probabilities, the risk to public safety in granting bail outweighs any suspected impairment upon the public interest. However, in the absence of bodily harm, accused persons should not be burdened with a reverse onus simply because the allegations are violent in nature.

This is what the proposed changes imply.

Reverse onus provisions must not be changed except with the utmost concern for an accused’s right to a fair trial, as the denial of reasonable bail has been known to impair their ability to make full answer and defense. If Bill C-14 is passed, the onus during bail hearings in violent matters would be de facto on the accused.

As Member of Parliament for Souris – Moose Mountain, please consider these arguments when you represent our district in the House Of Commons tomorrow.

Sincerely,

Travis Mitchell Patron
www.travispatron.ca
+1(306)840-7889

Canadian Nationalist Party
www.nationalist.ca
PO Box 490, Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0