Categories
Judicial

More Lies From Regina Leader Post

In an article dated February 24th, the Regina Leader Post claims that I was convicted of harassment for “following an interracial couple around a Saskatoon mall and asking the man repeatedly: “Why are you walking around with our women if you weren’t born in Canada?””.

This is false.

I asked the complainant:

Why are you walking around with our women if you’re not born here?

Although not everyone might agree with the premise of this question, it is not an imprisonable one. There is nothing inherently wrong with posing such a question to someone when the conversation is consentual.

Regina Leader-Post (Postmedia Network Canada) is one of many media outlets in Canada falsely reporting on political candidates in an attempt to distort public perception.

An accused person is entitled to all evidence within the possession of the Crown which might reasonably speak to their defence.

This political prosecution has been conducted as part of an effort to suppress nationalism in Canada.

Since 2017, we have been advocating reinstating the Immigration Act of 1952. These proceedings have already had a chilling-effect on the debate surrounding immigration reform. In a country where the judiciary is supposed to be impartial, imprisoning political candidates for asking such a fair question is wrong.

These proceedings further demonstrate that Canadians who advocate their nationality are being imprisoned for doing so. They demonstrate that the current administration in Ottawa is adversarial toward Canadian nationalism. This comes shortly after the Liberal Government announced it’s intention to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country” (2015 – present).

The accused person has committed no crime here. Their actions were reasonable, and in the absence of full and frank disclosure, I reserve my section 11(d) Charter right to be presumed innocent.

I do not apologize for asking such a question. Nor do I apologize for being nationalist.

Categories
Judicial

Ottawa, We Have A Problem …

A conflict of interest has arisen between the Province of Saskatchewan and the nationhood of Canada.

Inter-governmental dispute
“An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in the case of a controversy between Canada and a province or between two or more provinces.”

  • Supreme Court Act, section 35.1 (file #41944)

The Province of Saskatchewan has been using special operations to deprive our nation of its right to electoral democracy (occurrence #2019-919038), and because the innocent blood of a federal party leader has been spilled in the matter, the case is categorically different (sui generis).

No one spills the blood of a Canadian without paying for it (nec veniam, sanguine innocentis effuso). So either Saskatchewan will apologize for causing this to be done, or Saskatchewan will disappear. If Saskatchewan is remorseless, Saskatchewan will fade away … (multis e gentibus vires)

“Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”

  • Matthew 17:20
Categories
Judicial

A Nation Conflicted Cannot Stand

A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand.

  • Mark 3:24

For more on information #991240166: Supreme Court Application for leave to appeal