On July 4th, the accused (myself) submitted an application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal information #991240166 (filing confirmation #2025-07-bne-z7t).
The charges under the information include an alleged breach of Criminal Code sections 264 (criminal harassment) and 733.1 (failure to comply with probation order).
On September 5th, 2023, Justice Penner of the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan ordered a publication ban on the identity of the complainant.
At trial on January 16th, 2024, the Court refused to disclose to the accused evidence used by the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) to lay charges under the information.
During sentencing submissions on February 2nd, 2024, the trial judge (Justice Morrall of the Court of King’s Bench) cited section 718.2(a)(i) CC. to impose a more severe sentence against the accused, claiming their actions at the scene were motivated by hate based on national origin.
On September 19th, 2024, Saskatchewan dismissed the appeal of the accused while they were still in custody at the Regina Provincial Correctional Center (RPCC).
Today is Wednesday, July 30th and the accused awaits word from the Court in furtherance of the application for leave to appeal being scheduled for hearing.
This is a list of latin maxims I gleaned from studying The Dictionary Of Canadian Law by Daphne Dukelow (3rd Edition). I am reproducing them here as I believe they are relevant to political life in Canada today and can help secure our future as a unique nationality.
This list is by no means exhaustive. There may be additional maxims of Canadian law that have not be included here.
The list is as follows:
prior tempore potior jure – The person first in time is preferred in right.
testes ponderantur, non numerantur – witnesses should be weighed, not numbered.
jus non patitur ut iden bis solvatur – The law does not require a second payment for the same thing.
juris effectus in executione consistit – The effect of law is given by execution.
jura publica anteferenda privatis – Public rights should be preferred over private rights.
volenti non fit injuria – To a willing person, injury is not done.
judicium a non suo judice datum nullius estmomenti – A judgement given without proper jurisdiction has no effect in law.
melius est petere fontes quam sectari rivulos – It is better to go to the source than follow tributaries.
mentio unius exclusio alterius – To mention one thing is to exclude another.
minatur innocentibus, qui parcit nocentibus – Whoever spares the guilty threatens the innocent.
multa concedunter per obliquum, quae non concedunter de directo – Many things are permitted indirectly which are not permitted directly.
fatetur facinus qui judicium fugit – One who flees judgement admits guilt.
lex prospicit non respicit – The law looks forward, not backward.
lex uno ore omnes alloquitur – The law addresses all parties with a single voice.
lex est dictamen rationis – Law is the pronouncement of reason.
leges extra territorium non obligant – Laws are not binding outside their own territory.
judices non tenentur exprimere causam sententiae suae – Judges are not required to explain the reason for their decisions.
nemo reus est nisi mens sit rea – No one is guilty unless they have a guilty mind.
quot homines tot sententiae – There are as many opinions as there are people.
quod nullius est id ratione naturali occupanti conceditur – What belongs to no one is by natural right granted to its occupier.
rerum suarum quilibet est moderator et arbiter – Each person is manager and judge of their own affairs.
non est regula quis fallet – A rule does not exist without exceptions.
quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalecit – What does not go well from the beginning will not improve with the passage of time.
res judicata pro veritate accipitur – Until reversed, a judicial decision is conclusive and its truth may not be contradicted.
nemo patriam in qua natus est exuere nec ligeantiae debitum enjurare possit – No one can cast away the country where they were born, nor foreswear the allegience owed to its sovereign.
nihil habet forum ex scena – The court has no concern for things which are not before it.
eodem ligamine quo ligatum st dissolvitur – An obligation is ended the same way in which it was imposed.
qui vult decipi decipiatur – Let the one who wants to be deceived be deceived.
non jus, sed seisina, facit stipitem – Not right, but seisin, makes the family tree.
os demonstrat quod cor ruminator – The mouth divulges what the heart is thinking.
multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium – That many people make the mistake does not excuse the error.
respiciendum est judicanti, ne quid aut durius aut remissius constituatur quam causa deposcit; nec enim aut severitatis aut clementiae gloria affectanda est – The one who judges should be mindful that nothing either more severe or more lenient is done than the case merits; for distinction should not be achieved by either severity or leniency.
ignorantia juris non excusat – Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
illus quod alias licitum non est necessitas facit licitum; et necessitas inducit privilegium quod jure privatur – Necessity permits what otherwise is not permitted; and necessity establishes a privilege which is justly removed.
clam deliquentes magis puniunter quam palam – Those who sin secretly are punished more severely than those who sin openly.
arma in armatos sumere jura sinunt – To use arms against persons who are armed is justifiable.
judicia in deliberationibus crebro maturescunt, in accelerato processu nunquam – Judgements often ripen through deliberation, never in a hurried process.
invito beneficium non datur – A benefit is not given to anyone who did not ask for it.
actor sequitur forum rei – A plaintiff must take the case to the defendant’s jurisdiction.
majus dignum trahit ad se minus dignum – The more worthy brings the less worthy along with it.
crescente malitia crescere debet et poena – Where malice increases, punishment should also increase.
cujus est dare ejus est disponere – The one who gives something can also control its disposition.
debile fundamentum fallit opus – A weak foundation destroys the work.
dies dominicus non est juridicus – The Lord’s Day (Sabbath) is not a day for business (Lord’s Day Act).
libertas est naturalis facultas ejus quod cuique facere libet – Freedom is the power given by nature to do whatever one pleases.
longa possessio parit jus possidendi et tollit actionem vero domino – Prolonged possession creates a right of possession, and removes any right of action from the real owner.
justitia nemini neganda est – Justice should be denied to no one.
melius est omnia mala pati quam malo consentire – It is better to endure all evil than to agree to evil.
in his quae de jure communi omnibus conceduntur, consuetudo alicujus patriae vel loci non est alleganda – In those things which common right concedes to all, the custom of a particular country or place should not be brought forward.
jus descendit, et non terra – Right descends, and not the land.
in judicio non creditor nisi juratis – In trial, no one’s evidence is accepted unless that person is sworn.
jus non habenti tute non paretur – It is safe to disobey one who has no legal right.
justitia debet esse libera – Justice should be free.
vir et uxor consentur in lege una persona – Husband and wife are held to be one person in law.
vigilantibus subvenit lex – The law helps the vigilant.
vim vi repellere licet, modo fiat moderamine inculpatae tutelae – It is legal to repel force with force, as long as it is governed by a desire to defend.
vox emissa volat, litera scripta manet – The spoken word disappears, the written word remains.
rex non potest peccare – The monarch can do no wrong.
legatus regis vice fungitura quo destinatur et honograndus est sicut ille cujus vicemgerit – An ambassador takes the place of the monarch who sent them and should be honoured just as the person in whose place they stand.
jurare est deum in testem vocare, et est actus divini cultus – To swear is to call a deity to witness, and is an act of religious worship.
vix ulla lex fieri potest quae omnibus commoda sit – Barely any law can be made which is applicable to everything.
qui sentit commodum sentire debet etonus – The one who bears the burden should also reap the benefit.
salus populi est suprema lex – The safety of the people is the highest law.
quae non valeant singula juncta juvant – Words which have no effect alone are effective when combined.
quod nullius est, est domini regis – What belongs to no individual belongs to the sovereign.
quod necessarium est licitum – What is necessary is also lawful.
impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat – leaving a crime unpunished invites worse crimes to be committed.
electa una via, non datur recursus ad alteram – Having elected, recourse to the alternative is not permitted.
donari videtur, quod nullo jure cogente conceditur – A thing is considered given when it is transferred any way except by virtue of right.
error qui non restitur, approbatur – One who fails to rectify a mistake is deemed to have approved it.
do ut facias – I give so that you may perform.
nec veniam, effuso sanguine innocentis, casus habet – If innocent blood is spilled, the case is unforgivable.
extra legem positus est civiliter mortuus – One placed outside the law is dead civilly.
omne quod solo inaedificatur solo cedit – Everything built into the ground is merged with it.
omnia quae jure contrahuntur, contrario jure pereunt – All things accomplished by a law come to naught with a contradictory law.
On July 30th, 2023, I posed this question to an immigrant at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon.
Three days later, the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) was at my door threatening to “knock it in”, and shortly thereafter, broke and entered the apartment without a warrant.
This is a home invasion.
Under such duress, I surrendered myself into custody and spent the next 19 months incarcerated by the Province of Saskatchewan for advocating Canadian nationalism.
As men, protecting the interests of our nation (and our women for that matter) is our birthright, even when they may not understand why we do what we do. An administration that sets itself against this prerogative is acting contrary to our national interests and deserves no public support.
Questioning the motives of immigration is not a crime. For an electoral candidate advocating the political ideology of nationalism, questioning it is expected.
No person is required to agree with my interpretation of Canadian nationalism (they are free to choose who to vote for at the polls), but I am entitled to enforce such policies within reason.
On January 8th, 2025, I applied to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal for leave to appeal this matter to the Supreme Court of Canada, given that the proceedings used evidence which ought to have been deemed inadmissible because its tendering into the court was a vicarious liability on behalf of the Crown. The peace officer who testified at trial on January 16th, 2024, recklessly waived their right to refuse answering questions tending to prejudice our national interest after they were informed that the court had not been declared according to Canadian law (no mention of His Majesty The King):
Right of refusal to answer or produce document “Any person examined under any order made under this Part has the like right to refuse to answer questions tending to criminate himself, or other questions, as a party or witness, as the case may be, would have in any cause pending in the court by which, or by a judge whereof, the order is made.”
– Section 50(1), Canada Evidence Act
After the Justice dismissed my motion to strike this evidence from the charge about to be given to the jury, a verdict of guilty was rendered and a sentence imposed. This was done using inadmissible evidence and by withholding other exculpatory evidence (that which speaks to my innocence).
Upon application for the video recording made of me at the Midtown Plaza scene, the SPS has decided to withhold this evidence that paints the interaction in a substantially different light:
Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) refuses to disclose a video recording of me at the scene on July 30th, 2023 taken by the complainant. The video shows me informing (‘don’t violate our laws’) the complainant that they’re suspected of causing a disturbance at Midtown Plaza that day.
The complainant’s party was at suspicion of causing a disturbance, and in response, I acted within reason. I maintain I have committed no offense at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon.
Despite this, the provincial Crown claims I am now not allowed to attend Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon because my actions on July 30th, 2023 were a public safety risk. This is yet another example where Canadian nationalists are excluded from public property without due process. The real public safety risk lies with an administration that is attempting to criminalize our nation simply for existing.
Appeals with leave of provincial court Subject to sections 39 and 42, an appeal to the Supreme Court lies with leave of the highest court of final resort in a province from a final judgment of that court where, in the opinion of that court, the question involved in the appeal is one that ought to be submitted to the Supreme Court for decision.
– Section 37, Supreme Court Act
It is a question of law whether my actions at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon on July 30th, 2023 served the public good, and whether there is evidence the actions alleged went beyond what served the public good. For greater certainty, it is a question of law whether the audio recording of the trial held in this matter (January 15th – 18th, 2024) demonstrates that no evidence exists to convict the accused.
In October, 2024, Justice Kaufman of the Federal Court (Winnipeg) refused to hear our application for the audio recording of this trial to be disclosed federally. The disclosure of this audio recording was already granted by Justice Morrall himself on September 4th, 2024 after we made an application for it to the Saskatchewan Court of King’s Bench, although it was not provided to us in time for our appeal hearing on September 6th, 2024.
We have yet to receive a copy of this audio recording.
On January 8th, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal refused our application for leave to appeal this matter (CACR3770) to the Supreme Court and now we stand deprived of our right to a fair trial in the matter.
On January 8th, 2025, we applied to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal for leave to appeal the lower court’s decision to use inadmissible evidence in the charge made to the jury (information #991240166).
As it now stands, there exists no evidence that my actions in Saskatoon that day extended beyond what served the public good.
The prosecution in this matter has prejudiced our national interest by manipulating the evidence at trial.
I have made this appeal to the court of last resort in Saskatchewan because I have witnessed the harm that is being done to Canadian interests as a result of this provincial government abusing its authority.
Justice Morrall committed a crime by counseling Canadian peace officers in furtherance of persecuting the accused and the nationality we advocate for:
Conspiracy, attempt, etc. “Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.”
– Section 4(1.1), Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act
I’ve been saying it since 2017 and I will say it again here: we need immigration reform. Without any apparent democratic channel to implement such a reform, Saskatchewan is imprisoning political advocates for questioning an immigration system that is fracturing our national identity. As it stands today, our immigration system is being weaponized against us in furtherance of transitioning Canada into the “world’ first post-national country” – a political objective first announced by the Liberal Government in 2015.
Historically, Canada has sourced its immigration from Northern Europe and the British Isles. We support returning to this immigration policy (see: Immigration Act of 1952).
The implication understood from this encounter is that immigrants do not respect what Canada has been traditionally nor our way of life. If they did, they would answer our questions, which are fair and reasonable. However, they refuse, even during cross-examination at trial …
Our application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis to the Supreme Court was apparently faxed to the court registry by the Regina Provincial Correctional Center (RPCC) on October 1st, 2024.
We demand that this appeal be heard by the Supreme Court, as the offense at suspicion of being committed (crimes against humanity) far outweighs in public importance claims of “criminal harassment” relating to my actions at Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon that day.
