democracy – Travis Patron

“If You Don’t Open Your Door, We’re Going To Knock It In”

Because justice is a balancing act, the court of law often conducts a test of proportionality in order to ensure that both parties involved are rewarded/punished fairly.

For every transgression, there is an appropriate remedy. For every wrong, there is a corresponding right. And where the court administering the affair prejudices either side, there is a higher court to which an appeal may be brought.

The law can be thought of as a moving target where the customs of the court follow the particular jurisdiction it operates in. What works in one locale may not work in another.

In Saskatchewan, the Crown can only proceed against citizens in good faith and without deceit (Clause 63, Magna Carta). However, they have recently violated this understanding …

On August 2^nd, 2023, I was a legal resident of Saskatoon. On that day, the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) attended my apartment claiming they had a warrant for my arrest, and that if I didn’t open the door, they’d “knock it in”:

“We have a warrant for your arrest.”

SPS Constable Heather Primeau (#727), 241 5^th Avenue N in Saskatoon on August 2^nd, 2023 9:43 AM

Shortly thereafter, they broke and entered the property, thereby committing a home invasion:

Aggravating circumstance — home invasion
If a person is convicted of 348 in relation to a dwelling-house, the court imposing the sentence on the person shall consider as an aggravating circumstance the fact that the dwelling-house was occupied at the time of the commission of the offence and that the person, in committing the offence,
(a) knew that the dwelling-house was occupied; and
(b) used threats of violence to property.

Section 348.1, Criminal Code

SPS Constable Kevin Sanderson (#884) broke and entered my apartment on August 2^nd, 2023.

Weidner Apartment Homes Apartment #502 located at 241 5^th Avenue North in Saskatoon was broken into on August 2nd, 2023.

Entrance
“For the purposes of sections 348 and 349, a person enters as soon as any part of his body or any part of an instrument that he uses is within any thing that is being entered; and a person shall be deemed to have broken and entered if he obtained entrance by collusion with a person therein”

– Section 350, Criminal Code

However, during trial conducted voir dire on May 6^th, 2024, the Saskatoon Police Service testified that they had no warrant in the matter.

That type of threat to my property, combined with them breaking and entering the apartment, is enough to nullify any claim that my actions were not the result of oppressive circumstances.

Without a warrant, the Saskatoon Police Service had no right to conduct themselves the way they did.

I was led to believe that the SPS was executing an arrest warrant, a warrant that, after hearing testimony from SPS Detective Sergeant Tracy Shepherd (#556, Hate Crimes Unit), didn’t exist.

I surrendered myself into their custody under duress and reserve a common law defense in relation to these proceedings for doing so:

Common law principles continued
“Every rule and principle of the common law that renders any circumstance a justification or excuse for an act or a defence to the charge continues in force and applies in respect of proceedings for an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament except in so far as they are altered by or are inconsistent with this Act or any other Act of Parliament.”

Section 8(3), Criminal Code of Canada

On May 6^th, 2024, I cross-examined Saskatoon peace officer Heather Primeau about this, who swore an oath to tell the truth, then immediately proceeded to testify falsely against me under that oath. She claimed to have “never” threatened to knock in my door, but I know otherwise …

“Thou shall not testify falsely against thy neighbor”.

Exodus 20:16

The Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) has proceeded in this matter mala fide (in bad faith).

Therefore, on August 29^th, 2024, I made an application before Justice MacMillan-Brown to quash the warrant of committal (order #95300896) in furtherance of my right to a fair trial in the matter. Pursuant section 778(c) of the Criminal Code, a common law writ of certiorari is sufficient to quash the warrant of committal on the grounds that the omission to provide a fair trial in the matter has been the cause of persecution.

The Justice presiding dismissed that application. Instead, their fiat order dated September 2^nd, 2024 insults my ability to communicate this grievance …

Because of Saskatchewan’s superior court dismissing this application, the innocent blood of a political party leader has been spilled.

That’s the real crime …

The prosecution related to this information was political in nature as none of the allegations were violent. Rather than being about public safety, these proceedings have been adversarial to Canadian nationalism.

There is a war of deception being waged against our nation. The intention is to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country”. In order to do so, the Crown is effecting an unwarranted demographic change of our founding population, predominantly through immigration policy to which there exists no democratic mechanism to alter.

As described in section 13 of the Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act, obedience to de facto authority is no justification here …

Conflict with internal law
Despite section 15 of the Criminal Code, it is not a justification with respect to political persecution that the offense was committed in obedience to or in conformity with the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

Section 13, Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act

Leadership Contest

leadership contest means a competition for the selection of the leader of a registered party.

Section 2, Canada Elections Act

It has been said that nothing exists in a vacuum and my leadership with the Canadian Nationalist Party is no exception.

In order to remain viable, it must be contestable. It is not my intention to be a self-appointed dictator of the party.

For this reason, I am hereby announcing that the Canadian Nationalist Party will commence a leadership contest at the conclusion of this 45^th Federal Election (April 28^th) in order to determine the question of party leadership. The contest will conclude when the Governor General of Canada issues the writ commencing the 46^th Federal Election or the contest is concluded according to its rules of procedure (whichever comes first).

What this means is that any naturalized citizen may stand for nomination to become the new leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party.

I am making this decision because in order to remain fair, the position of party leader must be potentially available to any naturalized Canadian.

Although Elections Canada claims that our party is no longer registered, I maintain that our party was de-registered in violation of Canadian law. Therefore, the leadership contest will be conducted internally in accordance with the Canada Elections Act.

Canadian Nationalist Party event (showing guest speaker) held at Royal Canadian Legion Branch 344 in May of 2018.

Notice of Leadership Contest
If a registered party proposes to hold a leadership contest, the party’s chief agent shall file with the Chief Electoral Officer a statement setting out the dates on which the leadership contest is to begin and end.

– Section 478.1(1), Canada Elections Act

The terms of the contest are such that a new leader ought not to be determined by way of popular vote (every individual casting a ballot of equal weight). This is so because I don’t believe ballot casting to be the “nationalistic way”. The opinion of some simply carries more weight than others. Certain people should be able to influence their government to a greater degree than others. Indeed, when democracy consists of every divergent motive casting an equal say in the function of their government, it becomes stagnant, and the people whom democracy is meant to serve, are neglected.

The strongest and most intelligent have a divine right to rule. Therefore, our leadership contest will not be a display of ballot casting, but one of Canadian trivia.

Yes, the leader of the party must demonstrate they have the best working knowledge as it relates to Canadian society, history, and government.

This contest of trivia will be administered by an impartial panel of questioners and judges.

For each question answered correctly, a contestant will earn 1 point, and these points will continue accumulating for the duration of the contest. Each trivia session will feature 10 questions posed to the contestants. Trivia sessions will be held on a periodic (monthly) basis until the conclusion of the contest (whenever the 46^th Federal Election is called). If no writ is issued by the Governor General, the contest will continue until one contestant accumulates 30 points more than any other contestant.

If a new leader were chosen using this method, many aspects of the party would be subject to change. However, in outlining the parameters of this leadership contest, there are 3 things that I ask not to be changed by any party leader:

The party name ‘Canadian Nationalist Party’.
The party website domain name ‘www.nationalist.ca‘.
The party logo/symbol:

Medicinal Sun Wheel, Official Symbol of the Canadian Nationalist Party

I also reserve my right to compete in any such leadership contest myself. For now, I remain the incumbent leader.

Membership eligibility will continue to be open to naturalized Canadians only.

If you are someone who is interested in contesting leadership, you may apply by email (info@travispatron.ca) with subject line ‘Leadership Contest’.

A person may participate in this leadership contest at any point prior to its conclusion. However, in order to apply, the contestant must provide personal identification.

In order to facilitate this contest, the Canadian Nationalist Party reserves the right to peaceful public assembly in accordance with section 2(c) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Note: the contest original stated it would be concluded when one contestant accumulated 50 points more than any other contestant. This target has been reduced to 30 points more than any other contestant.