“A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand.“
- Mark 3:24
For more on information #991240166: Supreme Court Application for leave to appeal
Categories
Tag: Elections Canada
Date of incident: April 28th, 2025 (45th Federal Election)
Elections Canada complaint: #PBR2Q0SN
There is a common maxim in law that justice is blind. No favouritism should be shown to any party, as each are to be judged impartially:
“Do not pervert justice; do not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the great, but judge your neighbor fairly.”
- Leviticus 19:15
However, Canada has recently departed from this mandate by prejudicing our national interests in favour of “post-nationalism” – a policy first announced by the Liberals in 2015. Evidently, the Federal Court has followed this call by neglecting to review suspected foreign interference in our democracy (occurrence #2019-919038).
During the 45th Federal Election (April 28th, 2025), I was listed as an independent candidate (as opposed to my political affiliation listed in the nomination papers) because the returning officer for my electoral district of Souris-Moose Mountain could not confirm the registration status of the Canadian Nationalist Party:
“I am running as an ‘Independent’ because, at the discretion of the returning officer, the registration status of the Canadian Nationalist Party could not be determined at the time of nomination.”
However, the complainant in the matter that led to the de-registration of the Canadian Nationalist Party on March 31st, 2022 (Canadian Anti-Hate Network), used Elections Canada’s disclosure of our 2019 registration application to submit criminal complaints to the RCMP under occurrence #2019-919038. This disclosure is governed by the Privacy Act, as are judicial reviews in actions relating to international affairs and defence.
This matter is potentially injurious to national security because we have not received an opportunity under the Privacy Act to answer to the charges while there is suspicion they were laid against the party leader using information obtained from a foreign entity (special operations, section 8 Foreign Interference and Security of Information Act). It also demonstrates that the Government of Canada is failing to maintain our democracy.
By refusing to uphold our right to a judicial review as described by the privacy notice in Elections Canada’s agreement (Section O, EC 20360), the Government of Canada is neglecting our status as a political party:
In 2019, the Elections Canada disclosed to the Canadian Anti-Hate Network ~263 membership declarations contained in this application and used this disclosure in furtherance of de-registering the Canadian Nationalist Party. Both the disclosure of these declarations (Section O) and the disclosure of information used to lay charges under occurrence #2019-919038 are governed by the Privacy Act.
The Canadian Nationalist Party has the right to a judicial review in the matter by the Federal Court. However, we have been denied that right while our candidates are prohibited from standing for election under our ‘Nationalist’ affiliation. This is prejudicial toward our nation interests.
Therefore, the Canadian Nationalist Party, as it was recorded in Elections Canada’s registry on the date of registration (September 15th, 2019), ought to be reinstated pursuant section 70 of the Supreme Court Act (Supreme Court file #41944):
Consent to Reversal of Judgment
A respondent may consent to the reversal of the judgement appealed against by giving to the appellant a notice entitled in the Court and in the cause, and signed by the respondent stating that the respondent consents to the reversal of the judgment, and thereupon the Court shall pronounce judgment of reversal as of course.
- Section 70, Supreme Court Act
These proceedings against our nation have been done in an attempt to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country” for the benefit of foreign powers.
This is a serious crime and the appropriate measures must be taken to ensure that it is thoroughly investigated and those responsible prosecuted to the fullest extent of Canadian law.
Categories
“Free & Democratic Society”
In their charge to the jury on October 5th, 2022, Court of King’s Bench for Saskatchewan Justice Neil Robertson cited Canada as a “free and democratic society”.
4 years have passed since those charges were laid on February 14th, 2021 under section 319 of the Criminal Code and I have yet to receive even a copy of the criminal complaint submitted to the Crown in the matter.
By withholding such access to personal information, the Crown has exceeded the reasonable limits demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society (section 1 of the Charter).
On April 16th, 2021, the Crown used this information to deny myself bail, and subsequently, de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party.
In June of this year, the Federal Court refused our right to access this information and I have now made an appeal to the Supreme Court to determine the validity of imprisonment following Justice Hind’s April 16th, 2021 decision to apply a reverse onus on the accused to “show cause” why they should be granted bail.
I reserve my right of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum pursuant section 784(3) of the Criminal Code in order to avoid an apparent conflict of interest that has arisen between the nationhood of Canada and the Province of Saskatchewan (section 35.1, Supreme Court Act).
This withholding of information used to apply a reverse onus has not been done for the sake of our national interests, but to advance a political objective of transitioning Canada into the “world’s first post-national country”. Therefore, I am making representations to the Crown that it be disclosed to the accused.
We originally made this application to the Supreme Court on October 1st, 2024 in accordance with the sessions of that court (section 32, Supreme Court Act).
Very real risk to public safety …
“The fear that sensitive information may ultimately be disclosed may lead our intelligence agencies to decide not to share it with law enforcement, with a corresponding and very real risk to public safety”
– Senator Marc Gold on the use of secret intelligence in Canadian courts
It’s time for Canada to embark on a discovery of what information exactly was used to deprive our nation of its right to electoral democracy.
After refusing us access to the information requested, the burden lies with the Crown to prove that it has not been used to violate our nation’s right to a “free and democratic society”, and unless the Crown can prove this, the religious sermon entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe will remain public on this here website.
As trier of fact, the Canadian public has the right to examine this propaganda as evidence in the claim that it is protected under Article 4 of the Treaty of Paris:
“His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholick religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit.”
– Article 4, Treaty Of Paris (February 10th, 1763)
This speech was originally published in June of 2019, and for over 18 months following, Richard Warman of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network filed criminal complaints with the RCMP under the false presence that it is ‘Jews’ I am referring to as parasites (despite my consistent refutations).
The Canadian Anti-Hate Network has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in financial grants from the federal government and has used these grants to file criminal ‘hate speech’ complaints against political candidates under the false pretense of “combating anti-semitism”:
False Pretences
“Every one commits an offence who knowingly makes, directly or indirectly, a false statement in writing with intent that it should be relied on, with respect to the financial condition of any organization that he acts for, for the purpose of procuring, in any form whatsoever beneficial to that organization, the granting of credit;”
– Section 362(1)(c)(iv), Criminal Code
And so while organizations such as B’nai Brith might cry victim while lashing out, the propaganda in question enjoys immunity from prosecution by way of our Roman Catholic right as enshrined in treaties binding on the Crown.
If Canada is truly a “free and democratic society”, then it will hear the appeal we have made to the Supreme Court in addition to diplomatic immunity from any prosecution related to occurrence #2019-919038.