habeas corpus – Travis Patron

Because justice is a balancing act, the court of law often conducts a test of proportionality in order to ensure that both parties involved are rewarded/punished fairly.

For every transgression, there is an appropriate remedy. For every wrong, there is a corresponding right. And where the court administering the affair prejudices either side, there is a higher court to which an appeal may be brought.

The law can be thought of as a moving target where the customs of the court follow the particular jurisdiction it operates in. What works in one locale may not work in another.

In Saskatchewan, the Crown can only proceed against citizens in good faith and without deceit (Clause 63, Magna Carta). However, they have recently violated this understanding …

On August 2^nd, 2023, I was a legal resident of Saskatoon. On that day, the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) attended my apartment claiming they had a warrant for my arrest, and that if I didn’t open the door, they’d “knock it in”:

“We have a warrant for your arrest.”

SPS Constable Heather Primeau (#727), 241 5^th Avenue N in Saskatoon on August 2^nd, 2023 9:43 AM

Shortly thereafter, they broke and entered the property, thereby committing a home invasion:

Aggravating circumstance — home invasion
If a person is convicted of 348 in relation to a dwelling-house, the court imposing the sentence on the person shall consider as an aggravating circumstance the fact that the dwelling-house was occupied at the time of the commission of the offence and that the person, in committing the offence,
(a) knew that the dwelling-house was occupied; and
(b) used threats of violence to property.

Section 348.1, Criminal Code

SPS Constable Kevin Sanderson (#884) broke and entered my apartment on August 2^nd, 2023.

Weidner Apartment Homes Apartment #502 located at 241 5^th Avenue North in Saskatoon was broken into on August 2nd, 2023.

Entrance
“For the purposes of sections 348 and 349, a person enters as soon as any part of his body or any part of an instrument that he uses is within any thing that is being entered; and a person shall be deemed to have broken and entered if he obtained entrance by collusion with a person therein”

– Section 350, Criminal Code

However, during trial conducted voir dire on May 6^th, 2024, the Saskatoon Police Service testified that they had no warrant in the matter.

That type of threat to my property, combined with them breaking and entering the apartment, is enough to nullify any claim that my actions were not the result of oppressive circumstances.

Without a warrant, the Saskatoon Police Service had no right to conduct themselves the way they did.

I was led to believe that the SPS was executing an arrest warrant, a warrant that, after hearing testimony from SPS Detective Sergeant Tracy Shepherd (#556, Hate Crimes Unit), didn’t exist.

I surrendered myself into their custody under duress and reserve a common law defense in relation to these proceedings for doing so:

Common law principles continued
“Every rule and principle of the common law that renders any circumstance a justification or excuse for an act or a defence to the charge continues in force and applies in respect of proceedings for an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament except in so far as they are altered by or are inconsistent with this Act or any other Act of Parliament.”

Section 8(3), Criminal Code of Canada

On May 6^th, 2024, I cross-examined Saskatoon peace officer Heather Primeau about this, who swore an oath to tell the truth, then immediately proceeded to testify falsely against me under that oath. She claimed to have “never” threatened to knock in my door, but I know otherwise …

“Thou shall not testify falsely against thy neighbor”.

Exodus 20:16

The Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) has proceeded in this matter mala fide (in bad faith).

Therefore, on August 29^th, 2024, I made an application before Justice MacMillan-Brown to quash the warrant of committal (order #95300896) in furtherance of my right to a fair trial in the matter. Pursuant section 778(c) of the Criminal Code, a common law writ of certiorari is sufficient to quash the warrant of committal on the grounds that the omission to provide a fair trial in the matter has been the cause of persecution.

The Justice presiding dismissed that application. Instead, their fiat order dated September 2^nd, 2024 insults my ability to communicate this grievance …

Because of Saskatchewan’s superior court dismissing this application, the innocent blood of a political party leader has been spilled.

That’s the real crime …

The prosecution related to this information was political in nature as none of the allegations were violent. Rather than being about public safety, these proceedings have been adversarial to Canadian nationalism.

There is a war of deception being waged against our nation. The intention is to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country”. In order to do so, the Crown is effecting an unwarranted demographic change of our founding population, predominantly through immigration policy to which there exists no democratic mechanism to alter.

As described in section 13 of the Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act, obedience to de facto authority is no justification here …

Conflict with internal law
Despite section 15 of the Criminal Code, it is not a justification with respect to political persecution that the offense was committed in obedience to or in conformity with the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

Section 13, Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act

Under the guise of “ending hate”, the Government of Canada is facilitating a radical demographic change of our founding population.

This hypocrisy of biblical proportions (Matthew 23) aims at reducing Canadians to a dwindled minority in their homeland in order to transition us into “the world’s first post-national country” as communicated by the Liberal government shortly after their election to the Prime Minister’s office in 2015.

In order to do so, this administration is depriving our nation of any meaningful democratic channel.

At seemingly every opportunity, those who advocate the ideology of nationalism are excluded from public property without due process. This includes libraries we’ve not been to, convention centers we’ve already booked, and university campuses we’re alumni of.

The reason that these Globalists are attempting to suppress our voices and injure our public image is because they know the only ideology capable of resisting their hostile takeover of our sovereignty is that of nationalism – a group of people united by ancestry and origin, speaking the same language and working for a common objective.

If they are to achieve their political agenda of a one-world government oligarchy, they cannot have sovereign nations operating autonomously outside their locus of control.

The perpetrators claim that our propaganda entitled “Beware The Parasitic Tribe” is a criminal liability under section 319 of the Criminal Code. They’ve been making such accusations since June of 2019. We’ve yet to receive a copy of the evidence used against us despite numerous requests for full and frank disclosure.

This propaganda uploaded to our website in June of 2019 is not a criminal liability because the Province Of Saskatchewan lacks inpersonam jurisdiction to prosecute such matters under section 319 of the Criminal Code:

The Province Of Saskatchewan committed an error in law on April 16^th, 2021 by applying a reverse onus on the accused to show cause why they should be granted release during a bail review. During this bail review, the court used accusations of so-called “hate speech” in relation to the party leader publishing propaganda entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe as secondary grounds to deny reasonable bail. In their June 29^th, 2021 decision, Justice Robertson of the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan, refused my application to (by way of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum) perform “at least” a review of jurisdictional error made by Justice Hinds in applying this reverse onus. On December 2^nd, 2021, the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (CACR3476) again refused to perform such a review of jurisdictional error made in denying me bail earlier that year. Justice Robertson would then go on to preside over proceedings in the Court of King’s Bench, where I was sentenced ultra vires to 365 days incarceration for the aforementioned propaganda.

What the Province Of Saskatchewan has actually done is aid in illegally depriving our nation of a democratic channel.

In 2021, shortly after I was denied bail by the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan, Elections Canada (supposedly partisan and independent) changed the information contained in their registry as it relates to the Canadian Nationalist Party, replacing myself as the leader with Gus Stefanis (someone who was neither a candidate nor a party member at the time):

Elections Canada changed the leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party *ex parte* and in violation of procedures laid out in the *Canada Elections Act* for updating a registered party’s information.

In accordance with section 405(3) of the Canada Elections Act, such a change in the information of a registered party must be made by resolution of the party. However, at no point did our party resolve to appoint a new leader …

New Leader
The report of a change of leader for a party shall include a copy of the resolution of the party to appoint the new leader, certified by the new leader and another officer of the party.

– Section 405(3), Canada Elections Act

The Canadian Nationalist Party is structured as a corporate sole, meaning that with only a single director (myself), the decisions which affect the corporation internally cannot be made except by the will of that sole director.

With the actual leader (myself) being arbitrarily imprisoned by the Province Of Saskatchewan, and new leader (Gus Stefanis) unable to maintain 250 declared members, Elections Canada de-registered the party on March 31^st, 2022.

Elections Canada de-registered the federal Nationalist Party as its leader was being imprisoned in contravention of their right to have the validity of their detention determined by habeas corpus.

The right to have the validity of a person’s imprisonment determined by writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental principle of justice inherent in the constitution of all countries within the British Commonwealth.

It is also encoded in section 2 of our Canadian Bill of Rights:

The Parliament of Canada, affirming that our nation is founded upon the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person, and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions which remain free only with respect to morality, spirituality, and the rule of law.

Every law of Canada shall, unless it is expressly declared by an Act of the Parliament of Canada that is shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgement or infringement of any of the rights and freedoms herein recognized and declared, and in particular, no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to deprive a person who has been detained with remedy by way of habeas corpus for the determination of the validity of his imprisonment and for his release if the detention is not lawful;

– Section 2(c)(iii), Canadian Bill of Rights

This is indeed a matter of national security which demands a court proceeding be conducted pursuant section 784(3) of the Criminal Code:

Refusal of application, and appeal
Where an application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is refused by a judge of a court having jurisdiction therein, no application may again be made on the same grounds, whether to the same or to another court or judge, unless fresh evidence is adduced, but an appeal from that refusal shall lie to the court of appeal, and where on the appeal the application is refused a further appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court of Canada, with leave of that Court.

– Section 784(3), Criminal Code

Shortly after the change in Elections Canada’s registry of party information was made, Stefanis was allowed to stand for nomination as a candidate in the 44^th Federal Election with Elections Canada.

The name ‘Canadian Nationalist Party’ is proprietary information not to be used without the necessary permissions.

Trafficking in Identity Information
Everyone commits an offence who obtains or possesses another person’s identity information with intent to use it to commit an indictable offence that includes fraud, deceit, or falsehood as an element of the offence.

– Section 402.2(2), Criminal Code

I bring this matter to the public’s attention not for my sake as an individual, but for the sake of our collective, our nationality. Something is clearly wrong when our nation can be so nonchalantly the victim of elections fraud.

Fraud Affecting Public Market
Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

– Section 380(2), Criminal Code

Part of the reason I ran in this here 45^th Federal Election was to bring public accountability to this claim of elections fraud. However, it seems Elections Canada is intent on covering up their violation of our party using more lies.

Below you will see the list of candidates standing for election in the district of Souris-Moose Mountain. You will also notice my campaign website (www.travispatron.ca) conspicuously missing from their listing despite being included in my nomination papers.

Listing of Candidates in district of Souris-Moose Mountain for 45th Federal Election

In response to Elections Canada not listing my campaign website, I filed a complaint with their office on Friday, April 11^th. A week later my website is still not listed but I did receive this response from Elections Canada, refusing to list this website because, in their opinion, it is “hateful”:

This sort of baseless accusation is becoming increasingly common in Canadian society and used to unreasonably deprive our people of all sorts of public services.

At this point, my message to Canadians would be that if we are waiting for political change to come through the ballot box, we will be waiting until the cows come home.

One of the strengths of nationalism lies in its versatility. What I mean by this is that if the status quo is providing us no meaningful democratic channel, than our activism must take on an anti-democratic form.

We need not wait for the next opportunity to compete in one of Elections Canada’s contests because liberation is simply not on the ballot.