“Free & Democratic Society”

In their charge to the jury on October 5^th, 2022, Court of King’s Bench for Saskatchewan Justice Neil Robertson cited Canada as a “free and democratic society”.

4 years have passed since those charges were laid on February 14^th, 2021 under section 319 of the Criminal Code and I have yet to receive even a copy of the criminal complaint submitted to the Crown in the matter.

By withholding such access to personal information, the Crown has exceeded the reasonable limits demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society (section 1 of the Charter).

On April 16^th, 2021, the Crown used this information to deny myself bail, and subsequently, de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party.

In June of this year, the Federal Court refused our right to access this information and I have now made an appeal to the Supreme Court to determine the validity of imprisonment following Justice Hind’s April 16^th, 2021 decision to apply a reverse onus on the accused to “show cause” why they should be granted bail.

I reserve my right of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum pursuant section 784(3) of the Criminal Code in order to avoid an apparent conflict of interest that has arisen between the nationhood of Canada and the Province of Saskatchewan (section 35.1, Supreme Court Act).

This withholding of information used to apply a reverse onus has not been done for the sake of our national interests, but to advance a political objective of transitioning Canada into the “world’s first post-national country”. Therefore, I am making representations to the Crown that it be disclosed to the accused.

We originally made this application to the Supreme Court on October 1^st, 2024 in accordance with the sessions of that court (section 32, Supreme Court Act).

Very real risk to public safety …
“The fear that sensitive information may ultimately be disclosed may lead our intelligence agencies to decide not to share it with law enforcement, with a corresponding and very real risk to public safety”

– Senator Marc Gold on the use of secret intelligence in Canadian courts

It’s time for Canada to embark on a discovery of what information exactly was used to deprive our nation of its right to electoral democracy.

After refusing us access to the information requested, the burden lies with the Crown to prove that it has not been used to violate our nation’s right to a “free and democratic society”, and unless the Crown can prove this, the religious sermon entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe will remain public on this here website.

As trier of fact, the Canadian public has the right to examine this propaganda as evidence in the claim that it is protected under Article 4 of the Treaty of Paris:

“His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholick religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit.”

– Article 4, Treaty Of Paris (February 10^th, 1763)

This speech was originally published in June of 2019, and for over 18 months following, Richard Warman of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network filed criminal complaints with the RCMP under the false presence that it is ‘Jews’ I am referring to as parasites (despite my consistent refutations).

The Canadian Anti-Hate Network has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in financial grants from the federal government and has used these grants to file criminal ‘hate speech’ complaints against political candidates under the false pretense of “combating anti-semitism”:

False Pretences
“Every one commits an offence who knowingly makes or causes to be made, directly or indirectly, a false statement in writing with intent that it should be relied on, with respect to the financial condition of any organization that he is interested in or that he acts for, for the purpose of procuring, in any form whatsoever, whether for his benefit or the benefit of that organization, the granting of credit;

– Section 362(1)(c)(iv), Criminal Code

And so while organizations such as B’nai Brith might cry victim while lashing out, the propaganda in question enjoys immunity from prosecution by way of our Roman Catholic right as enshrined in treaties binding on the Crown.

If Canada is truly a “free and democratic society”, then it will hear the appeal we have made to the Supreme Court in addition to diplomatic immunity from any prosecution related to occurrence #2019-919038.