Tag: Saskatoon

On July 30^th, 2023, I posed this question to an immigrant at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon.

Three days later, the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) was at my door threatening to “knock it in”, and shortly thereafter, broke and entered the apartment without a warrant.

This is a home invasion.

Under such duress, I surrendered myself into custody and spent the next 19 months incarcerated by the Province of Saskatchewan for advocating Canadian nationalism.

As men, protecting the interests of our nation (and our women for that matter) is our birthright, even when they may not understand why we do what we do. An administration that sets itself against this prerogative is acting contrary to our national interests and deserves no public support.

Questioning the motives of immigration is not a crime. For an electoral candidate advocating the political ideology of nationalism, questioning it is expected.

No person is required to agree with my interpretation of Canadian nationalism (they are free to choose who to vote for at the polls), but I am entitled to enforce such policies within reason.

On January 8^th, 2025, I applied to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal for leave to appeal this matter to the Supreme Court of Canada, given that the proceedings used evidence which ought to have been deemed inadmissible because its tendering into the court was a vicarious liability on behalf of the Crown. The peace officer who testified at trial on January 16^th, 2024, recklessly waived their right to refuse answering questions tending to prejudice our national interest after they were informed that the court had not been declared according to Canadian law (no mention of His Majesty The King):

Right of refusal to answer or produce document
“Any person examined under any order made under this Part has the like right to refuse to answer questions tending to criminate himself, or other questions, as a party or witness, as the case may be, would have in any cause pending in the court by which, or by a judge whereof, the order is made.”

– Section 50(1), Canada Evidence Act

After the Justice dismissed my motion to strike this evidence from the charge about to be given to the jury, a verdict of guilty was rendered and a sentence imposed. This was done using inadmissible evidence and by withholding other exculpatory evidence (that which speaks to my innocence).

Upon application for the video recording made of me at the Midtown Plaza scene, the SPS has decided to withhold this evidence that paints the interaction in a substantially different light:

The complainant’s party was at suspicion of causing a disturbance, and in response, I acted within reason. I maintain I have committed no offense at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon.

Despite this, the provincial Crown claims I am now not allowed to attend Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon because my actions on July 30^th, 2023 were a public safety risk. This is yet another example where Canadian nationalists are excluded from public property without due process. The real public safety risk lies with an administration that is attempting to criminalize our nation simply for existing.

Appeals with leave of provincial court
Subject to sections 39 and 42, an appeal to the Supreme Court lies with leave of the highest court of final resort in a province from a final judgment of that court where, in the opinion of that court, the question involved in the appeal is one that ought to be submitted to the Supreme Court for decision.

– Section 37, Supreme Court Act

It is a question of law whether my actions at the Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon on July 30th, 2023 served the public good, and whether there is evidence the actions alleged went beyond what served the public good. For greater certainty, it is a question of law whether the audio recording of the trial held in this matter (January 15^th – 18^th, 2024) demonstrates that no evidence exists to convict the accused.

In October, 2024, Justice Kaufman of the Federal Court (Winnipeg) refused to hear our application for the audio recording of this trial to be disclosed federally. The disclosure of this audio recording was already granted by Justice Morrall himself on September 4^th, 2024 after we made an application for it to the Saskatchewan Court of King’s Bench, although it was not provided to us in time for our appeal hearing on September 6^th, 2024.

We have yet to receive a copy of this audio recording.

On January 8^th, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal refused our application for leave to appeal this matter (CACR3770) to the Supreme Court and now we stand deprived of our right to a fair trial in the matter.

As it now stands, there exists no evidence that my actions in Saskatoon that day extended beyond what served the public good.

The prosecution in this matter has prejudiced our national interest by manipulating the evidence at trial.

I have made this appeal to the court of last resort in Saskatchewan because I have witnessed the harm that is being done to Canadian interests as a result of this provincial government abusing its authority.

Justice Morrall committed a crime by counseling Canadian peace officers in furtherance of persecuting the accused and the nationality we advocate for:

Conspiracy, attempt, etc.
“Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.”

– Section 4(1.1), Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act

I’ve been saying it since 2017 and I will say it again here: we need immigration reform. Without any apparent democratic channel to implement such a reform, Saskatchewan is imprisoning political advocates for questioning an immigration system that is fracturing our national identity. As it stands today, our immigration system is being weaponized against us in furtherance of transitioning Canada into the “world’s first post-national country” – a political objective first announced by the Liberal Government in 2015.

Historically, Canada has sourced its immigration from Northern Europe and the British Isles. We support returning to this immigration policy (see: Immigration Act of 1952).

The implication understood from this encounter is that immigrants do not respect what Canada has been traditionally nor our way of life. If they did, they would answer our questions, which are fair and reasonable. However, they refuse, even during cross-examination at trial …

Our application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis to the Supreme Court was apparently faxed to the court registry by the Regina Provincial Correctional Center (RPCC) on October 1^st, 2024.

We demand that this appeal be heard by the Supreme Court, as the offense at suspicion of being committed (crimes against humanity) far outweighs in public importance claims of “criminal harassment” relating to my actions at Midtown Plaza in Saskatoon that day.