Categories
Judicial

More Lies From Regina Leader Post

In an article dated February 24th, the Regina Leader Post claims that I was convicted of harassment for “following an interracial couple around a Saskatoon mall and asking the man repeatedly: “Why are you walking around with our women if you weren’t born in Canada?””.

This is false.

I asked the complainant:

Why are you walking around with our women if you’re not born here?

Although not everyone might agree with the premise of this question, it is not an imprisonable one. There is nothing inherently wrong with posing such a question to someone when the conversation is consentual.

Regina Leader-Post (Postmedia Network Canada) is one of many media outlets in Canada falsely reporting on political candidates in an attempt to distort public perception.

An accused person is entitled to all evidence within the possession of the Crown which might reasonably speak to their defence.

This political prosecution has been conducted as part of an effort to suppress nationalism in Canada.

Since 2017, we have been advocating reinstating the Immigration Act of 1952. These proceedings have already had a chilling-effect on the debate surrounding immigration reform. In a country where the judiciary is supposed to be impartial, imprisoning political candidates for asking such a fair question is wrong.

These proceedings further demonstrate that Canadians who advocate their nationality are being imprisoned for doing so. They demonstrate that the current administration in Ottawa is adversarial toward Canadian nationalism. This comes shortly after the Liberal Government announced it’s intention to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country” (2015 – present).

The accused person has committed no crime here. Their actions were reasonable, and in the absence of full and frank disclosure, I reserve my section 11(d) Charter right to be presumed innocent.

I do not apologize for asking such a question. Nor do I apologize for being nationalist.

Categories
Academic

Nēhiyawēwin

My name is Travis Patron and I am an amateur practitioner of the Cree (Nēhiyawēwin) language.

I practice this language because I believe it is important for Canadians to pay homage to the languages native to this land.

Many of these Indigenous languages are in danger of becoming obsolete because they are not being socially supported.

As a candidate for public office, it is important to use these languages because there is historical knowledge encoded in them. When we lose a language, we lose the memories that accompany the natural history of that people. The stories that grounded the culture and gave the people a sense of purpose and identity fade away with the language when it is forgotten.

I speak a little Cree. I am still learning and not an expert by any means. However, I enjoy the challenge of learning a new language.

The experience can also be fun because it allows a person to immerse themselves in a new culture. Languages literally define culture. If a person desires to live in a culturally different way, they must speak a different language.

When we speak a new language, the way the world responds to us changes with it because the way we make sense of the world and attempt to understand society is through the spoken word.

When the words we use change, so too does the world around us. Words build worlds. Words materialize.

Unfortunately, it seems not everyone supports my efforts to learn such native languages. Shortly after delivering the following presentation on the Cree language at the University of Saskatchewan, I was inexplicably banned:

This is a CREE 110 presentation given before the White Buffalo Man on Friday, May 12th, 2023 at the University of Saskatchewan.

Despite being issued a trespass notice by Protective Services, I returned to campus a few months later and was accused of impersonating a peace officer (section 130(1)(a) CC.) when I did so. However, this criminal proceeding (information #991239849) does not preclude the Crown’s own liability under section 430(4.101)(b) of the Criminal Code which they incurred for interfering with my enjoyment of the University of Saskatchewan:

“Everyone commits mischief who wilfully interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment, or operation of a building, structure, or part of a building or structure that is used primarily by an identifiable group as defined in subsection 318(4) CC. as an educational institution – including a university – or an object associated with that institution located on the grounds of such a building or structure.”

  • Section 430(4.101)(b), Criminal Code
The subsequent ticket from disregarding this trespass notice (ticket #85560322) was stayed by the Crown before I could speak to it, essentially prejudicing my defense in matters where Saskatchewan convicted me of impersonating a peace officer (information #991239849).

These proceedings were conducted by the University of Saskatchewan Protective Services in response to my attempt to nationalize the University and I have yet to be given an opportunity to speak in my defense regarding them.

Therefore, I reserve my section 11(b) Charter right to be tried within a reasonable time for allegedly failing to comply with the trespass notice (ticket #85560322).

Categories
Judicial

A Nation Conflicted Cannot Stand

A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand.

  • Mark 3:24

For more on information #991240166: Supreme Court Application for leave to appeal